While I’m Away
Feb. 14th, 2014 11:37 amTomorrow I’ll miss you,
Remember I’ll always be true.
And then while I’m away,
I’ll write home every day,
And send all my loving to you.
I’ll pretend that I’m kissing
The lips I am missing
And hope that my dreams will come true.
And then while I’m away,
I’ll write home every day,
And send all my loving to you.
All my loving I will send to you.
All my loving, darling I’ll be true.
(All My Loving: Lennon & McCarthy – 1964)
For the past seven years I’ve written Valentine blogs to my wife Kathleen. Beginning in 2007, these essays and stories became a better alternative than agonizing over finding a suitable gift that would convey my love and affection. Chocolate candy and a card might have been fine when we were dating, but a wonderful wife, and great mother, deserved something more substantial. So, except for a slip-up in 2011, I’ve been writing love stories of past and present events. This year, as I prepared to write another, I was struck by the fact that Kathy and I are fast approaching a significant milestone. Next year, 2015, we will have been married for 40 years! This means that I have been in love with Kathleen for even longer – 42 years, to be exact. But, since I didn’t meet Kathy until after February 14th of 1973, we’ve only celebrated 41 Valentine Days together. These numbers and dates again got me thinking about our first year together, how we met, the dates we had, and how we have changed over the years. I especially recalled the summer of ’73, when I came to fully realize that, for the first time in my life, I was completely and hopelessly in love.


I have no memory of that Kathy-less Valentine’s Day in 1973. In fact, thinking back now, I’m pretty sure I did everything to ignore it. You see I was going through some major emotional convulsions at the time. A relationship with a female teacher at school had ended badly, and I was generally unhappy with the current course of my life. I fell into teaching quite accidently after being discharged from the Air Force. I took the job because a position as an instructor at my Alma Mater was eminently more desirable than one at the burglar alarm company I worked at during college. But teaching at a Catholic high school was never the ultimate vision of my future. After a year of teaching, I decided to return to UCLA, seeking an MA in Latin American Studies. My plan was to pursue a diplomatic career in the Foreign Service of the State Department after graduation. To refresh my knowledge of the language, history, and culture of Mexico, I decided to travel to Mexico City that summer and take some courses at the Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico (UNAM). Plus, I thought it would be fun to visit and spend time with all my Mexican relatives, living in a city famous for charm, romance, and adventure. I even managed to convince my high school friend Greg to join me.
After graduating from the University of California in Riverside, Greg was teaching in a Catholic elementary school in Glendale, and contemplating a leap into public school education. He believed that qualifying as a bilingual instructor would be a wise career move and greatly enhance his prospective for the future. His thinking was to accompany me to Mexico and immerse himself in Spanish at the university and in the city. However, while these travel plans were moving forward smoothly, four long months of teaching school still loomed ahead. I found myself feeling more and more restless, and impatient for a meaningful relationship. In desperation, I sought out my friends Sister Carol and Sister Marilyn of the Community of St. Joseph of Carondelet (CSJ) in the lunchroom one afternoon, and asked them to introduce me to a 23-year old student-teacher they had spoken about by the name of Kathleen. I wrote an essay of this first encounter with Kathleen in a previous Valentine blog (You Look Wonderful Tonight). While I got some of the details right, two witnesses to the same events didn’t recall my descriptions or my behavior in quite the same way. Both Kathy and Sister Marilyn had totally different pictures of the nervous and overly talkative young man who was clearly trying too hard to impress a certain young woman.

This brings me to the point where I have to confess that despite my best efforts, my recollection of many past events have slowly faded and changed with time. Although I can sometimes zero in on the dates and facts of some events, specific details become hazier and hazier. One would think that bringing together the people who were actually present would be a successful method for piecing together the true story. But I’ve found that even this stratagem can prove problematic. For example, I could never convince my friends Jim and Greg that they attended my graduation ceremony at UCLA in 1970. No amount of details could shake their firm conviction of never having been there. I finally had to show them a photograph taken by my father. It showed me standing in my commencement gown, surrounded by these two high school friends, and a third, Wayne Wilson, with Pauley Pavilion in the background. Only then did they finally concede that they must have been there. So memory can be uncertain and shaky grounds on which to base a supposedly factual story. Then, if you factor in volatile emotions, like love, anger, and depression, stories can become downright fanciful. You see, I’m no longer sure why I REALLY needed to go to Mexico. I seem to recall that I was all mixed up and dissatisfied with the current state of my personal and professional affairs. Sure I had friends in and out of school, and we would get together regularly on Fridays and weekends, but they were distractions at best. Friends and family couldn’t fill my need for something more, or someone special. I felt a great big void in my life, and there was nothing or no one to fill it. I’m pretty sure that I viewed my upcoming Mexico trip as an escape from my dilemma, and a romantic leap into the unknown.

The idea for this essay actually began with a silly spat Kathy and I had last year while watching television. I became angry and started scolding Kathy for persistently pressing me to explain myself. I’d done something that puzzled her, and she started questioning me about it, wanting to know my motivations and thought processes. I became annoyed over what I perceived as an overly aggressive, cross-examination.
“After all these years,” I concluded, impatiently, “you’d think that you’d finally stop asking me to explain myself. Sometimes I make thoughtless decisions, and the more I try explaining them, the more foolish I feel. I wish you’d stop it, because I feel you’re trying to indict me”.
“I’m sorry you feel that way,” Kathy responded, in a hurt tone. “I didn’t mean to sound harsh or critical. I just wanted to understand what you did, because I wanted to help. You know”, she added, as an aside, “you used to love those traits about me. I haven’t changed. And I know you felt that way about me, because you told me so in your letters”.


Those words brought me up short. First, I realized that she was right. Kathy hasn’t really changed in any significant way from the young woman I met in 1973. Yes, she has matured and evolved over the years, but essentially she remains the same girl I loved and married such a long time ago. She has always been curious about people and their actions, and interested in helping them. Secondly, she cited a source that I had completely forgotten about. You see, just 80 days after meeting Kathy in that CSJ convent in Westchester in 1973, I left for Mexico. Kathy’s remark about my letters gave me a window to my emotional state 41 years ago. That was the moment I decided that those letters would be the basis for this year’s Valentine.

Surprisingly, the 20-odd letters, postcards, and greeting cards, written and mailed during my 55-day sojourn in Mexico City, didn’t provide a lot of specific, day-to-day information. Instead they described how miserable and lonely I felt, and detailed how much I missed Kathleen; longing to be with her, talking to her, holding her, and kissing her. A quick synopsis of this correspondence reveals a lovesick young man who was constantly second guessing his reasons for going to Mexico. All my logical calculations and plans for the trip and the future had been short-circuited by a young woman. My lovelorn condition was obvious to Greg as soon as the bus left the terminal, and was confirmed throughout the tedious trip to Mexico City when I couldn’t stop talking about Kathleen and questioning my motives for leaving. Even though my grandmother, aunts, and uncles had been alerted to the existence of a novia (a “serious girlfriend”) by my mother, my obsessive need to write and receive letters, and arranging for long distance phone calls, immediately betrayed the depth of my feelings for her as well. Despite this lovesick malaise, I somehow managed to compartmentalize my feelings and emotions and followed through with our plans. My Aunt Totis helped enroll us into a full load of classes at UNAM, and then arranged Greg’s room and board with a Mexican family living near the university. We went to daily classes beginning at 8:00 am and usually finished by 2:00 pm, after which we usually traveled about the city, exploring the neighborhoods, the sights, mercados, cafes, and bars. When I wasn’t with Greg or in class, I also visited my aunts and uncles, and spent time with my adult cousins. In general, I came away with five impressions from those letters to Kathy:


First, these letters talked of my longings for Kathleen: how I missed her, longed to talk to her, be with her, hold her, and kiss her. Second, they described the uniqueness and strangeness of these feelings. I had never missed or longed for a girl like this before. I’d had girlfriends in high school and college; I’d traveled to Mexico twice before (after graduating from high school and college); and I’d written to these girls on those occasions. But those letters were callow and superficial expressions of what I was seeing and doing in Mexico, not betraying what I was feeling or missing. Writing to Kathy opened up whole new areas of honest expression and introspection. I spent less time reporting what I was doing in Mexico, and accentuated my love and longings. Third, the letters seem to describe one long period of absolute misery. Before reading these letters, I’d begun to nostalgically remember the trip to Mexico as a time when Greg and I youthfully frolicked around Mexico without a care in the world, cutting classes, traveling by bus and metro, and exploring the nefarious and risqué parts of town. It was only while I re-reading them that I relived the agonies I suffered, and realized what a lovelorn and boring travel companion I must have been for Greg. I noted that even my cousins mocked me throughout my stay, referring to my “novia, Kati” as my “prometida” (Spanish for “fiancé”). Fourth, and most shockingly, was my constant use of the “L” word. I vaguely recalled the first time I admitted to Kathy that I loved her. I think it was during a phone conversation (I doubt I would have confessed it face-to-face), prior to leaving for Mexico. I remember being very nervous and apprehension when I said something like, “Kathy, I think I’m in love with you”. But my letters left no doubt as to what I believed and was readily expressing in each letter and card I mailed – I loved Kathleen Greaney with all my heart, and wanted to be with her all the time. Fifth, and finally, I betrayed the insecurities and jealousies that plague men when separated from the object of their passion and desire. I confessed that I was hounded by visions of other men, more handsome, charming, and witty than I, who would benefit from my absence and sweep her off her feet.



I thought about those letters from Mexico, and Kathy’s remark about not changing, for a long time. My first reaction was that I could not possibly be the same man who penned those romantic sentiments – but then I stopped. While I’m certainly older, slower, fatter, and less passionate than I was in 1973, I’m still madly in love with Kathleen and dread the idea of long separations from her (Just recalling the occasions Kathy traveled to Ireland and Switzerland without me sends shivers of loneliness and desperation down my spine). So, what has changed? Well, I’m no longer the passionate suitor who wanted to learn EVERYTHING he could about this beautiful girl who had come into my life. Back then I wanted to know about her family and friends, her past, her character and personality, and her likes and dislikes. This desire continued well into our honeymoon period in Santa Monica, our time of greatest learning, exploring, and experimentation. It wasn’t until the arrival of children that my focus began to shift away from her to the new interests of family, home, and careers. I think that was when I stopped being curious about Kathy, stopped studying her, and started taking her behaviors and her love for granted. I think Kathy was right when she said that she hasn’t changed all that much. Time and the challenges and adversities of life have certainly modified our behaviors and worn us down, but we’re still the same people, the same souls. Familiarity doesn’t so much breed contempt, as it dulls curiosity and dampens out desire to learn more about our mates. Perhaps that should be the purpose of Valentine’s Day for husbands and wives, and longtime mates – not to simply exchange gifts and expressions of love, but to renew its wonder.


So on this Valentine’s Day, I want to confess that while I will never know everything there is to know about you, I promise to start paying more attention, and begin learning about you again, so that you will truly believe me when I say:
“I love you, Kathleen Mavourneen, as much today as on the first day I loved you”.

